Thanks for visiting the AFBL website! If you are interested in joining us, please email the AFBL Commish at mstreeter06@gmail.com!

Author Topic: Expansion Discussion Thread  (Read 28353 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline LT

  • Idaho Steelheads
  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: +8/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Expansion Discussion Thread
« Reply #135 on: November 22, 2013, 03:39:10 pm »
also, in reality, any decent player picked is gonna get traded before the first season :)
+1
GM Illinois Piasa 2015-2016
GM Idaho Steelheads 2017-

Offline mikezone13

  • New Jersey Athletics
  • Global Moderator
  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1242
  • Country: au
  • Reputation: +9/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Expansion Discussion Thread
« Reply #136 on: November 22, 2013, 10:09:19 pm »
If we keep it simple, it will likely work best.. check this concept out...

1. All players drafted in 2015 and 2016 amateur drafts are auto protected, UNLESS they have ML service time (then they have to be included in the protected 20 players in point 2)
2. Each existing team can protect 20 other players
3. No existing team can lose more than ONE player per round AND every existing team loses one player per round (16 picks per round, 4 picks per expansion team per round)
4. This is optional... all players aged 20 and under on January 1st 2017 are auto-protected so long as they don't have any ML service time

What this means is that IF every existing team protected 20 guys on their current 25 man ML roster there would be 80 current ML level guys available for drafting, that's equal to 20 players per expansion team, plus all of the AAA and AA guys not drafted in 2015 and 2016.

What will likely happen is that some teams will also choose to protect some guys drafted in 2013 and 2014 so more ML level talent will be available.

This does three things:
1. Gives existing teams a choice to protect youth, current talent or a mix
2. Ensures there is enough ML level talent available for the expansion teams to use as trade bait or to build with
3. Ensures those 21-25 year old guys yet to make it in the big leagues are given a shot with an expansion team - it would be good to see some of these guys grow and become stars, and it will happen

I highly recommend keeping the protection simple so that everyone understands it.

Edit: I just ran this approach on my organisation and there would be handfuls of 1.5 to 2.5* players available, some veterans but also some guys who are nearly ready for the Majors. Some real diamonds for the right expansion team GMs - I expect others would protect less on their current 25man roster than me as well.
« Last Edit: November 23, 2013, 03:12:11 pm by mikezone13 »
New Jersey Athletics GM: 2013-
Playoffs: 2013-2021, 2024-
Championships: 2018, 2026

Offline mstreeter06

  • Colorado Bears
  • Administrator
  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7294
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: +16/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Expansion Discussion Thread
« Reply #137 on: November 23, 2013, 08:06:10 am »
I really like this concept, Mike!
AFBL Commish / Colorado Bears Founding Owner
Playoff Appearances: 2014-2024, 2031, 2033-2038, 2041-
Federation Cup Champs: 2016, 2017, 2021, 2023, 2031, 2033

NPBL - Kansas Storm
National Cup Champs: 2023, 2046, 2068

SBC - Manly-Warringah Sea Eagles
Playoff Appearances: 1961, 1962, 1963, 1967

My OOTP Franchises Spreadsheet

Offline LT

  • Idaho Steelheads
  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: +8/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Expansion Discussion Thread
« Reply #138 on: November 23, 2013, 09:56:19 am »
If we keep it simple, it will likely work best.. check this concept out...

1. All players drafted in 2015 and 2016 amateur drafts are auto protected, UNLESS they have ML service time (then they have to be included in the protected 20 players in point 2)
2. Each existing team can protect 20 other players
3. No existing team can lose more than player per round AND every existing team loses one player per round (16 picks per round, 4 picks per expansion team per round)
4. This is optional... all players aged 20 and under on January 1st 2017 are auto-protected so long as they don't have any ML service time

What this means is that IF every existing team protected 20 guys on their current 25 man ML roster there would be 80 current ML level guys available for drafting, that's equal to 20 players per expansion team, plus all of the AAA and AA guys not drafted in 2015 and 2016.

What will likely happen is that some teams will also choose to protect some guys drafted in 2013 and 2014 so more ML level talent will be available.

This does three things:
1. Gives existing teams a choice to protect youth, current talent or a mix
2. Ensures there is enough ML level talent available for the expansion teams to use as trade bait or to build with
3. Ensures those 21-25 year old guys yet to make it in the big leagues are given a shot with an expansion team - it would be good to see some of these guys grow and become stars, and it will happen

I highly recommend keeping the protection simple so that everyone understands it.

Edit: I just ran this approach on my organisation and there would be handfuls of 1.5 to 2.5* players available, some veterans but also some guys who are nearly ready for the Majors. Some real diamonds for the right expansion team GMs - I expect others would protect less on their current 25man roster than me as well.

excellent idea.
GM Illinois Piasa 2015-2016
GM Idaho Steelheads 2017-

Offline BaseballAddict32

  • Former New York Twin Towers GM
  • MVP Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 287
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: +7/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Expansion Discussion Thread
« Reply #139 on: November 23, 2013, 03:35:11 pm »
If we keep it simple, it will likely work best.. check this concept out...

1. All players drafted in 2015 and 2016 amateur drafts are auto protected, UNLESS they have ML service time (then they have to be included in the protected 20 players in point 2)
2. Each existing team can protect 20 other players
3. No existing team can lose more than ONE player per round AND every existing team loses one player per round (16 picks per round, 4 picks per expansion team per round)
4. This is optional... all players aged 20 and under on January 1st 2017 are auto-protected so long as they don't have any ML service time

What this means is that IF every existing team protected 20 guys on their current 25 man ML roster there would be 80 current ML level guys available for drafting, that's equal to 20 players per expansion team, plus all of the AAA and AA guys not drafted in 2015 and 2016.

What will likely happen is that some teams will also choose to protect some guys drafted in 2013 and 2014 so more ML level talent will be available.

This does three things:
1. Gives existing teams a choice to protect youth, current talent or a mix
2. Ensures there is enough ML level talent available for the expansion teams to use as trade bait or to build with
3. Ensures those 21-25 year old guys yet to make it in the big leagues are given a shot with an expansion team - it would be good to see some of these guys grow and become stars, and it will happen

I highly recommend keeping the protection simple so that everyone understands it.

Edit: I just ran this approach on my organisation and there would be handfuls of 1.5 to 2.5* players available, some veterans but also some guys who are nearly ready for the Majors. Some real diamonds for the right expansion team GMs - I expect others would protect less on their current 25man roster than me as well.

count me in
New York Twin Towers- 2017 - 2028

AFBL Pioneer League Wild Card- 2023, 2024

AFBL Pioneer League Champions- 2024

AFBL Federation Cup Champions- 2024

NorseKaiser

  • Guest
Re: Expansion Discussion Thread
« Reply #140 on: November 24, 2013, 10:28:58 am »
If we keep it simple, it will likely work best.. check this concept out...

1. All players drafted in 2015 and 2016 amateur drafts are auto protected, UNLESS they have ML service time (then they have to be included in the protected 20 players in point 2)
2. Each existing team can protect 20 other players
3. No existing team can lose more than ONE player per round AND every existing team loses one player per round (16 picks per round, 4 picks per expansion team per round)
4. This is optional... all players aged 20 and under on January 1st 2017 are auto-protected so long as they don't have any ML service time

What this means is that IF every existing team protected 20 guys on their current 25 man ML roster there would be 80 current ML level guys available for drafting, that's equal to 20 players per expansion team, plus all of the AAA and AA guys not drafted in 2015 and 2016.

What will likely happen is that some teams will also choose to protect some guys drafted in 2013 and 2014 so more ML level talent will be available.

This does three things:
1. Gives existing teams a choice to protect youth, current talent or a mix
2. Ensures there is enough ML level talent available for the expansion teams to use as trade bait or to build with
3. Ensures those 21-25 year old guys yet to make it in the big leagues are given a shot with an expansion team - it would be good to see some of these guys grow and become stars, and it will happen

I highly recommend keeping the protection simple so that everyone understands it.

Edit: I just ran this approach on my organisation and there would be handfuls of 1.5 to 2.5* players available, some veterans but also some guys who are nearly ready for the Majors. Some real diamonds for the right expansion team GMs - I expect others would protect less on their current 25man roster than me as well.

Works for me!

Offline mstreeter06

  • Colorado Bears
  • Administrator
  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7294
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: +16/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Expansion Discussion Thread
« Reply #141 on: November 24, 2013, 04:12:03 pm »
I have released the Expansion Draft and Protection List rules in the Expansion Draft Thread. The post is sticky'd and locked for a reason so we avoid the rules being lost in discussion and keep it up top. Any questions/discussions concerning the expansion process should be made here or in an email/PM to myself. Thanks!
« Last Edit: December 03, 2013, 11:39:53 am by mstreeter06 »
AFBL Commish / Colorado Bears Founding Owner
Playoff Appearances: 2014-2024, 2031, 2033-2038, 2041-
Federation Cup Champs: 2016, 2017, 2021, 2023, 2031, 2033

NPBL - Kansas Storm
National Cup Champs: 2023, 2046, 2068

SBC - Manly-Warringah Sea Eagles
Playoff Appearances: 1961, 1962, 1963, 1967

My OOTP Franchises Spreadsheet

Offline JKGuy16

  • Indiana Vipers
  • MVP Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 307
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: +7/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Expansion Discussion Thread
« Reply #142 on: November 28, 2013, 02:06:02 pm »
I have a few players who are listed as having 1 or 2 days of ML service.  Now there is no way they have ML service.  The only explanation I can come up with is that they were part of spring training.  This really shouldn't count as having ML service should it?  Just looking at their stats and they clearly haven't played a regular season game at the ML level. 

I'm just trying to clarify this situation.
Indiana Vipers -

AFBL Federation Cup Champions 2020, 2022, 2035

Frontier League Champions 2020, 2022, 2035

Frontier League Eastern Division Champions 2021, 2022, 2024, 2034, 2035, 2036, 2038, 2039

Frontier League Wild Card 2013, 2017, 2020, 2023

RETIRED NUMBERS:

Al Fuller #19

Willie Watson #22

Tommy Carr #34

Offline mikezone13

  • New Jersey Athletics
  • Global Moderator
  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1242
  • Country: au
  • Reputation: +9/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Expansion Discussion Thread
« Reply #143 on: November 28, 2013, 02:45:30 pm »
I have a few players who are listed as having 1 or 2 days of ML service.  Now there is no way they have ML service.  The only explanation I can come up with is that they were part of spring training.  This really shouldn't count as having ML service should it?  Just looking at their stats and they clearly haven't played a regular season game at the ML level. 

I'm just trying to clarify this situation.

If they've been on your 25man roster they will be listed as having service time (i.e. they could've spent 1 day on your 25 man, not played any innings and then got demoted to the minors) - i.e. every day they were on your roster counts, not sure if ST time counts as ML service time in our league or not.

If it does prove to be an error I'm sure the protection rules can be changed to those "20y/o or under at Jan 1st 2017 with less than 10 days ML service time" or something like that.
« Last Edit: November 28, 2013, 02:50:49 pm by mikezone13 »
New Jersey Athletics GM: 2013-
Playoffs: 2013-2021, 2024-
Championships: 2018, 2026

Offline mstreeter06

  • Colorado Bears
  • Administrator
  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7294
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: +16/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Expansion Discussion Thread
« Reply #144 on: November 28, 2013, 07:22:24 pm »
I'm all for that Mike. 10 days or less of ML service time would be fine with me.

I want as little confusion as possible. Thanks for noticing that detail Jason!
AFBL Commish / Colorado Bears Founding Owner
Playoff Appearances: 2014-2024, 2031, 2033-2038, 2041-
Federation Cup Champs: 2016, 2017, 2021, 2023, 2031, 2033

NPBL - Kansas Storm
National Cup Champs: 2023, 2046, 2068

SBC - Manly-Warringah Sea Eagles
Playoff Appearances: 1961, 1962, 1963, 1967

My OOTP Franchises Spreadsheet

Offline mstreeter06

  • Colorado Bears
  • Administrator
  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7294
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: +16/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Expansion Discussion Thread
« Reply #145 on: December 02, 2013, 12:53:30 pm »
Paul informed me that he doesn't have the time to properly commit to the expansion team and the league. I believe I have a replacement for the final expansion franchise. Stay tuned!

Georgia might be denied a team again. Lost the prospective owner for the inaugural season and possibly again here  ;D.
AFBL Commish / Colorado Bears Founding Owner
Playoff Appearances: 2014-2024, 2031, 2033-2038, 2041-
Federation Cup Champs: 2016, 2017, 2021, 2023, 2031, 2033

NPBL - Kansas Storm
National Cup Champs: 2023, 2046, 2068

SBC - Manly-Warringah Sea Eagles
Playoff Appearances: 1961, 1962, 1963, 1967

My OOTP Franchises Spreadsheet

Offline mstreeter06

  • Colorado Bears
  • Administrator
  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7294
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: +16/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Expansion Discussion Thread
« Reply #146 on: December 02, 2013, 06:57:24 pm »
Virginia will be the final Expansion Team instead of Georgia. This will also not change our realignment and new division setups.

Everyone welcome Steve Waugh (Steve Wunda here on the forum) as our newest and final Expansion owner!
AFBL Commish / Colorado Bears Founding Owner
Playoff Appearances: 2014-2024, 2031, 2033-2038, 2041-
Federation Cup Champs: 2016, 2017, 2021, 2023, 2031, 2033

NPBL - Kansas Storm
National Cup Champs: 2023, 2046, 2068

SBC - Manly-Warringah Sea Eagles
Playoff Appearances: 1961, 1962, 1963, 1967

My OOTP Franchises Spreadsheet

Offline claphamsa

  • West Virginia Hollers
  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: +5/-5
    • View Profile
Re: Expansion Discussion Thread
« Reply #147 on: December 02, 2013, 07:30:24 pm »
Virginia will be the final Expansion Team instead of Georgia. This will also not change our realignment and new division setups.

Everyone welcome Steve Waugh (Steve Wunda here on the forum) as our newest and final Expansion owner!

awww, a new minor league team! They can play in my Rookie ball stadium!
WV Hollers
2014 CHAPIIIIONS
2019 Champmasters

Offline mikezone13

  • New Jersey Athletics
  • Global Moderator
  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1242
  • Country: au
  • Reputation: +9/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Expansion Discussion Thread
« Reply #148 on: December 02, 2013, 09:16:05 pm »
Virginia will be the final Expansion Team instead of Georgia. This will also not change our realignment and new division setups.

Everyone welcome Steve Waugh (Steve Wunda here on the forum) as our newest and final Expansion owner!

Not this Steve Waugh? Aussie cricket captain and star player. :D
New Jersey Athletics GM: 2013-
Playoffs: 2013-2021, 2024-
Championships: 2018, 2026

Offline mstreeter06

  • Colorado Bears
  • Administrator
  • HOF Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7294
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: +16/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Expansion Discussion Thread
« Reply #149 on: December 03, 2013, 11:40:32 am »
Virginia will be the final Expansion Team instead of Georgia. This will also not change our realignment and new division setups.

Everyone welcome Steve Waugh (Steve Wunda here on the forum) as our newest and final Expansion owner!

awww, a new minor league team! They can play in my Rookie ball stadium!

Oh snap  8)
AFBL Commish / Colorado Bears Founding Owner
Playoff Appearances: 2014-2024, 2031, 2033-2038, 2041-
Federation Cup Champs: 2016, 2017, 2021, 2023, 2031, 2033

NPBL - Kansas Storm
National Cup Champs: 2023, 2046, 2068

SBC - Manly-Warringah Sea Eagles
Playoff Appearances: 1961, 1962, 1963, 1967

My OOTP Franchises Spreadsheet